Cases 41 - 50 of 10,851
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MANAGER HILGEN, WILLIE WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv01889
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
GOLDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garza-Guerra v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Garza Guerra
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
LANCE-GEIGER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
MARGIE LANCE-GEIGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
HOSKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
TITO HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lykens v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Scott Lykens
Defendant:
Colete S. Peters, James Petrucci, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TOOMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01805
Plaintiff:
DAVID TOOMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
