Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Jordan (PS) v. Securus Technologies
as 1:2025cv03052
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. CEO OF JPAY et al
as 5:2025cv00217
Plaintiff:
JAKE MALDONADO
Defendant:
CEO OF JPAY, CEO OF SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES and MASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
as 3:2025cv01354
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC and JPAY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morris v. Securus Technologies et al
as 3:2025cv00741
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Morris
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, J-Pay Incorporated LLC, Sergeant R. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Lucy v. Securus Technologies, et al
as 25-12206
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM N. LUCY
Defendant:
SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, K. ALBRITTON, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SECURUS and others
TOBIN et al v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES
as 3:2025cv00877
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A TOBIN and FLORIDA PRISONERS
Defendant:
SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-3445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Whibbey v. Aventiv Technologies et al
as 1:2025cv03035
Plaintiff:
Paul Whibbey
Defendant:
Aventiv Technologies, Securus Technologies, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Whibbey v. Aventiv Technologies et al
as 1:2025cv02897
Plaintiff:
Paul Whibbey
Defendant:
Aventiv Technologies, Securus Technologies, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Timmons v. Aventiv Corporation et al
as 9:2025cv00663
Plaintiff:
Richard Timmons
Defendant:
Aventiv Corporation, Securus Technologies, Timothy McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
