Cases 41 - 50 of 85,047
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05829
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLASEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv05693
Plaintiff:
HECTOR LUIS CLASEN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, HUDSON COUNTY JAIL OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-10 and KINTOCK GROUP MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. FITZGERALD
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LONG
Defendant:
RICHARD FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. AMOROSO et al
as 2:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
RESHAN SAVAGE BEY
Defendant:
AYLSSA AMOROSO, SGT. POLICE OFFICER BRYAN CARNEY, ANTHONY MICHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUTIERREZ v. KIRKLAND et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KIRKLAND, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHEAR and SCI FAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamey McKee v. M. Knapp, et al
as 24-1384
Plaintiff:
JAMEY MCKEE
Defendant:
M. KNAPP, Unit Manager at SCI Rockview and D.A. MINNOIA, Counselor at SCI Rockview
Broomer, Sr. v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Donald Broomer, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGINNIS v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
VERN E. MCGINNIS, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE KAREN HILL, CHCA JANA JORDAN, NURSE KATE HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WIMBISH v. GORNEAU et al
as 1:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RASHEED WIMBISH
Defendant:
OFFICER RONALD A. GORNEAU, OFFICER DIAMOND B. FUENTES, OFFICER DAVID LASASSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Vontez Scales
as 24-1779
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VONTEZ SCALES, also known as Tez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
