Cases 41 - 50 of 140,615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Booker v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Donte Booker
Respondent:
Melissa J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Donald v. USA
as 5:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Reuben Jahmell Dauntez Donald
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ali v. Lumico Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Keith Ali
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Miller v. USA
as 5:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Kamron Eugene Miller, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harper v. Magistrate and Circuit Courts of Cabell County et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Holly R. Harper
Defendant:
Magistrate and Circuit Courts of Cabell County, Dan Ferguson, J. E. Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsh v. Garrett et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Marsh
Defendant:
J. R. Garrett, A. Jordan, L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huntley v. Acting Secretary Julie Su United States Department of Labor
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Chad D. Huntley
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Julie Su United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Taylor et al v. EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ralph Taylor and Lloyd Baker
Defendant:
EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC and Tug Hill Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
