Cases 41 - 50 of 71,136
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ESTATE OF EDWARD L. SHELLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
ESTATE OF EDWARD L. SHELLEY, SARAH-ANN EDWARDS and KIMBERLY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
MOORMAN v. DELICE
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
KIR MOORMAN
Defendant:
J. DENICE and J. DELICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVEY v. JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JERRY DAVEY, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEAVELL, K. KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
DENZEL JORDAN
Respondent:
WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY-EL v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
