Cases 501 - 510 of 14,127
Suero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Domingo Garcia Suero
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Woodham v. NH, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Grace Woodham
Defendant:
NH, State of and John Doe
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cheung Hing Digital Limited v. Wu et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Defendant:
Hai Xing Qiao, Guangwei "William" Wu, Starfish Bridge Express and others
Plaintiff:
Cheung Hing Digital Limited
Trustee:
TD Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lines v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Lines
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Avery v. NH Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023fp00287
Plaintiff:
Edgar Clifford Avery, Jr.
Defendant:
NH Supreme Court, J. Donovan, NH Supreme Court, Chief Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Private Jet Services Group, LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Private Jet Services Group, LLC
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
