Cases 51 - 60 of 75,168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Scott Corsnitz, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environ, et al
as 24-1783
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CORSNITZ and GWENDOLYN CORSNITZ
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, FELICIA LAMPHERE, RON EBERT and others
Linda Atiyeh, et al v. Borough of Gettysburg, et al
as 24-1761
Plaintiff:
LINDA ATIYEH, GETTYSBURG INVESTORS LLC, THE GETTYSBURG MOOSE LLC and others
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF GETTYSBURG
Tim Burton v. Marc Ziegler
as 24-1803
Plaintiff:
TIM BURTON
Defendant:
MARC ZIEGLER, in his individual capacity as a Trooper for the Pennsylvania State Police
MOSS v. MOSS et al
as 2:2024cv05753
Defendant:
JEANNE E MOSS, JEANNE E JEFFERSON, NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAYNOR v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RYAN RAYNOR
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and DREAMWORKS ANIMATION STUDIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Currington v. Karpin
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Marlen D. Currington
Defendant:
Patrick Karpin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
