Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Griswold v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Maureen Griswold
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Sciolaro v. Simpson et al
as 4:2012cv01057
Plaintiff:
Dana Marie Sciolaro
Defendant:
Eden Simpson, Jeff Stevenson, Aaron Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eckert v. American National Red Cross
as 4:2012cv01403
Defendant:
American National Red Cross , American Red Cross Missouri-Illinois Blood Services Region, American Red Cross St. Louis National Testing Laboratory and others
Plaintiff:
Maureen S. Eckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avouris v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2011cv01793
Plaintiff:
Maureen Avouris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Williams v. Burgess et al
as 5:2011cv06001
Plaintiff:
Steven Lydell Williams
Defendant:
William Burgess, Wade Beerds, Maureen O'Rourke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Jordan et al
as 4:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
F. Charlene Henderson
Defendant:
John R. Jordan, Jr., Bobby L. Martin, Aubrey B. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Aubuchon v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2009cv00465
Plaintiff:
Maureen Ann Aubuchon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hallmark Marketing Corporation v. Rangel et al
as 4:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Hallmark Marketing Corporation
Defendant:
Randy Rangel, Maureen Rangel and Dolores Johnson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
