Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Dunn v. City of Salem et al
as 1:2010cv10604
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Dunn
Defendant:
City of Salem, Kimberley L. Driscoll, Salem Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. United States
as 1:2010cv10586
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Butcher v. Merrimack College et al
as 1:2009cv11957
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Butcher
Defendant:
Merrimack College, O'Malley, Michael DelGreco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doyle v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) et al
as 1:2009cv11723
Plaintiff:
Paul X Doyle
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Martinez v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2009cv11431
Plaintiff:
Marcos A. Martinez
Defendant:
William Hubbard, Bernard Hicks, Robert Colburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv11194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Muckle et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv10678
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Muckle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. Doyle
as 1:2009mc10060
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Doyle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10916
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
