Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Jennings v. USA
as 3:2016cv00404
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Keith Abdul Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JENNINGS v. NOLES et al
as 4:2016cv00086
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY, JEREMY NOLES and SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF CLARK COUNTY
Plaintiff:
ANTWONE JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Provision Living Associates, LLC
as 4:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Christine Jennings
Defendant:
Provision Living Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENNINGS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv00461
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JENNINGS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv00238
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JENNINGS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00005
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JENNINGS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2016cv00004
Defendant:
ASHTON B. CARTER, CITY OF INDIANAPOILS, ET AL, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LINDLEY v. JENNINGS
as 2:2015cv00346
Defendant:
GREGORY D JENNINGS
Plaintiff:
CANDICE SUZANNE LINDLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00698
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
