Cases 51 - 60 of 178
REED v. TURNER et al
as 2:2019cv00129
Defendant:
J. DENNY, SLATER, J. HELDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WAYNE REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv00920
Defendant:
DAVID POWELL, WAYNE COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, DAVID (LONNIE) MCCLINTOCK and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv00330
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and LANE COLLEGE
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03363
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
BRYAN S. LANE and JUDY LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bubb-Lane et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00599
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics Inc, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC, Biomet Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alan T Lane and Monica Bubb-Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. BROWN
as 2:2018cv00219
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. LANE et al
as 1:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COLLEGE and JAMES K. LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Lane v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Willie Lane
Defendant:
Ron Neal, G Payne and Dawn Buss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CABLE v. PATERNITY COURT et al
as 1:2017cv03722
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Defendant:
JOHN COX, MICHELLE LANE COX, LORI DURBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
