Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 51 - 60 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00157
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00066
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Pierce v. Shroff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff: Thomas Michael Pierce
Defendant: Subolt Shroff, Corizon LLC, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oldenburg v. Ridge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02367
Defendant: Laura Ridge, Unknown Pierce, Corizon and others
Plaintiff: Kurt Adam Oldenburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isom v. Pierce et al
as 2:2014cv02194
Defendant: Preston Pierce, Arthur Wegener, Nathan Duncan and others
Plaintiff: Kevin Andrew Isom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv08174
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Pierce v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01591
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party and Correctional Health Services
Plaintiff: Chester Eugene Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Arizona Event Center et al
as 2:2014cv01205
Plaintiff: Martel Pierce
Defendant: Arizona Event Center, Pro-Tec Security and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00961
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierce #232807 v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2013cv02352
Plaintiff: John B Pierce
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Unknown Studdley, Unknown Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?