Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Oldenburg v. Ridge et al
as 2:2014cv02367
Defendant:
Laura Ridge, Unknown Pierce, Corizon and others
Plaintiff:
Kurt Adam Oldenburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isom v. Pierce et al
as 2:2014cv02194
Defendant:
Preston Pierce, Arthur Wegener, Nathan Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Isom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv08174
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Pierce v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01591
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party and Correctional Health Services
Plaintiff:
Chester Eugene Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Arizona Event Center et al
as 2:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Martel Pierce
Defendant:
Arizona Event Center, Pro-Tec Security and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierce #232807 v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2013cv02352
Plaintiff:
John B Pierce
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Studdley, Unknown Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Ryan et al
as 4:2013cv00560
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Pierce
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Castro
as 2:2013cv00700
Defendant:
Steven Brian Castro
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
North County Communications Corporation of Arizona v. Qwest Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00466
Defendant:
Qwest Corporation , Gary Pierce, Bob Stump and others
Plaintiff:
North County Communications Corporation of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
