Cases 51 - 60 of 2,474
Brown et al v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Danae Brown and Amanda Andrews
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Sandrea Smith
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Courtney M. Smith
Defendant:
David Jones, David Martinez, Leroy D. Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Extended Stay America Inc.(MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Extended Stay America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Avis Car Rental (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Avis Car Rental
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Brakefield et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tanja Laverne Smith
Defendant:
Marcus Brakefield, Jeff Moore, Sarah Luz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
