Cases 51 - 60 of 407
Brooks v. Blair et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
C. Blair, T. Smith, T. Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Claiborne County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
RB, Joe Baker and Pam Baker
Defendant:
Claiborne County, Tennessee, Bob Brooks, Kenneth Joseph Ochoa, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2021cv02679
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hutzler et al v. Nuclear Security, LLC (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hutzler, Chad Acres, Chelsea Adkisson and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Griham v. Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02506
Plaintiff:
Justin griham, Emmanuel Meniru, Justin Jaico Griham and others
Defendant:
Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis, Taiyuan Brooks, A Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00039
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Denise Michelle Brooks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
