Cases 51 - 60 of 287
KINGFLY SPIRITS et al v. RAGGHIANTI et al
as 2:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
KINGFLY SPIRITS formerly doing business as PORT OF PITTSBURGH DISTILLERY, LLC, MARK WILLSON and EBBREZZA, INC.
Defendant:
BLAKE RAGGHIANTI, DAVID S. KLETT, JUSTINA TUSHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
KINGFLY SPIRITS et al v. RAGGHIANTI et al
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
KINGFLY SPIRITS formerly doing business as PORT OF PITTSBURGH DISTILLERY, LLC, MARK WILLSON and EBBREZZA, INC.
Defendant:
BLAKE RAGGHIANTI, DAVID S. KLETT, JUSTINA TUSHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BLAKE v. METROMILE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
MARK BLAKE
Defendant:
METROMILE, INC., DAN PRESTON, COLIN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
JULIAN et al v. PHILIP
as 2:2021mc00087
Respondent:
CPA SUNIL PHILIP
Petitioner:
D.D.S. JON JULIAN, D.D.S. BLAKE JULIAN and GREENVILLE DENTAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, P.A.
CICCOTELLI v. INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05296
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC., SCOTT F. SCHAEFFER, WILLIAM C DUNKELBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Blake et al
as 4:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Jonathan M Blake, Keli M. Neary and Josh Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
