Cases 51 - 60 of 2,478
Jackson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
John Jackson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
John Jackson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jackson v. Sweat et al
as 6:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Louis Jackson
Defendant:
Mable Sweat and Olawale Osibajo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pavelka v. Phoenix Financial Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jackson Lee Pavelka
Defendant:
Phoenix Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Sheadrick Lee Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson et al v. Mid-America Pet Food, L.L.C.
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Glenn Jackson, Kenneth Leonard, Dorothy Petersen and others
Defendant:
Mid-America Pet Food, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Anderson v. Virtue Recovery Center et al
as 6:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Virtue Recovery Center, Ms. FNU Jaquez, Dr. Rajesh Harripersad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
