Cases 51 - 60 of 1,864
Burrell v. Hawks et al
as 7:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
RN A. Hawks, A. Taylor, RN M. Reavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coles v. Dalton et al
as 7:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Coles
Defendant:
G. Dalton, K. Lewis, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chhabra v. ACW New Jersey, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Arun K Chhabra
Defendant:
ACW New Jersey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Coleman v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Leandra Mae Tanner, The City of Norfolk, Virginia, Robert Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Coles v. Dalton et al
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Coles
Defendant:
G Dalton, K. Lewis, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Ms. R.D. Young, Mr. Joseph B. Stallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
