Cases 51 - 60 of 163
Murray v. Meineke Corporate Office Headquarters et al
as 3:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Darlene Murray
Defendant:
Meineke Corporate Office Headquarters, Meineke Car Care Center #292, Meineke Car Care Center #2267 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holland v. Carmichael et al
as 3:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
Tyrone William Holland
Defendant:
Irwin H Carmichael, Felicia McAdoo, Trishawn Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. USA
as 7:2017cv00179
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dimitri Lesean Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MURRAY v. USA
as 1:2017cv00594
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
QUAVINCE SHAMON MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SNEED v. REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00584
Plaintiff:
HUBERT SNEED
Defendant:
REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. , SUSAN M. CAMERON , DEBRA A. CREW and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Givens Bey v. Murray et al
as 5:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Givens Bey, IV
Defendant:
FNU Murray, Robert Hamilton, Johnny Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DREW v. REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DREW
Defendant:
REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. , SUSAN M. CAMERON , DEBRA A. CREW and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MURRAY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2017cv00521
Plaintiff:
SHARON MURRAY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Murray v. SSC Silver Stream Operating Company, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
David Murray, Sr.
Defendant:
SSC Silver Stream Operating Company, LLC , SAVASENIORCARE, LLC , SAVASENIORCARE Consulting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, ET AL. V. STEIN, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS , NC RSOL , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, ERIK HOOKS, ANDY WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
