Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Shelton v. Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex et al
as 2:2013cv00487
Plaintiff:
Andre Shelton
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex, Danny Raymond, Louis Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gardner v. County of Baldwin et al
as 1:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Gardner, III
Defendant:
County of Baldwin, Sheriff Mack, Major Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Baldwin County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Baldwin County Correctional Facility, Jimmy Bennett, Dr. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Material Delivery Service Inc
as 2:2012cv02404
Plaintiff:
Wreath Sherman Burgess
Defendant:
Material Delivery Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
McBryar v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00575
Plaintiff:
Sherman McBryar
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Tobias Thomas, Robert L. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Butler et al
as 7:2012cv02218
Plaintiff:
Jereme DeMon Taylor
Defendant:
Freddie Butler, Joy McCracken and Sherman Marbutt
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Green et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02154
Plaintiff:
Gwen Green and Sherman Green
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing LLC , Interbay Funding LLC and Callins Law Firm LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Nix v. Attorney General for the State of Alabama
as 5:2012cv01703
Petitioner:
Robert Sherman Nix, III
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
