Cases 51 - 60 of 245
Penatzer v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00532
Plaintiff:
Travis Penatzer
Defendant:
David Shinn, Arizona, State of, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halstead v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00533
Defendant:
David Shinn, Arizona, State of, Doug Ducey and others
Plaintiff:
Collin Scott Halstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver, et al v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00445
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Daniel Town, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Loeffler, Ernie Lee Weaver, Jr., Travis Penatzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00388
Defendant:
M Thiem, Daniel Town, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Manuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Father Flanagan's Boys Home et al v Burkhart
as 3:2021cv08046
Plaintiff:
Father Flanagan's Boys Home, Boys Town and Claudia Dehring Dempster
Defendant:
John A Burkhart and James M Dehring Living Trust dated January 19, 2016
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodopoulos v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00307
Defendant:
David Shinn, Arizona, State of, Doug Ducey and others
Plaintiff:
Nick Rodopoulos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcum v. Marana, Town of et al
as 4:2021cv00070
Defendant:
Crystal Chavez, Marana Police Department, Quan Nguyen and others
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chino Valley, Town of et al
as 3:2021cv08009
Defendant:
Unknown Hubble, Unknown Parties, Unknown Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Bret Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
