Cases 51 - 60 of 556
Giscombe v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 6:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
M. A. Giscombe
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, NYS Department of Taxation and Finance, HR Block and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hampton v. ADP Inc. Alpheretta Georgia
as 4:2022cv03725
Plaintiff:
Janell Elizabeth Hampton
Defendant:
ADP Inc. Alpheretta Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. EMC Corp.
as 22-1356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EMC CORP.
Defendant:
ADP, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alco Engineering and Tooling Corporation v. ADP, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Alco Engineering and Tooling Corporation
Defendant:
ADP, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ADP, INC. v. COCHRANE
as 2:2022cv04208
Plaintiff:
ADP, INC.
Defendant:
ABBIE COCHRANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ADP, INC. v. GIVEN
as 2:2022cv04213
Plaintiff:
ADP, INC.
Defendant:
Jefferson Given
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
