Cases 51 - 60 of 241
Stross v. Collopy Real Estate, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv02480
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Defendant:
Collopy Real Estate, Inc., The Antonov Group, Inc., Herman Antonov and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Canada v. Davis et al
as 0:2021cv02186
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Alexander Davis, Stephen Montry, Chris Newlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02286
Plaintiff:
Justin Abner, Jesus Alvarez, James Anderson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rodriguez-Senum v. Senum et al
as 0:2021cv02280
Plaintiff:
Melissa Diane Rodriguez-Senum
Defendant:
Stephen Ray Senum, Pennington County Officer's, Ryan Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olson Property Investments, LLC v. Alexander
as 0:2021cv02104
Plaintiff:
Olson Property Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Alexander and Pherizia Davis
Stross v. Picture Tiles, LLC et al
as 0:2021cv01898
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
Picture Tiles, LLC, John Hillcrest and Dayna Hillcrest
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alexander v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2021cv01791
Plaintiff:
Lawanna Alexander
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Alexander v. 3M Company et al.
as 0:2021cv00816
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Alexander
Schaffer v. Chauvin et al
as 0:2020cv01577
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of, the, Derek Chauvin, J. Alexander Kueng and others
Plaintiff:
Kaarin Nelson Schaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Olson Property Investments, LLC
as 0:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
Patrizia Davis and Michael Alexander
Defendant:
Olson Property Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
