Cases 51 - 60 of 3,613
LEWIS v. SUTHERLAND et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER LEWIS
Defendant:
MARK SUTHERLAND, ANDREW LESLIE, ZANTAC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY (PPA), BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION (BAA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDREWS v. F.C.I. SCHUYLKILL et al
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
ALBERT L. ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
F.C.I. SCHUYLKILL and WARDEN BETH RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC v. SIMMONS
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC
Defendant:
ANDREW SIMMONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ramer III v. Warden of Columbia County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Randy Andrew Ramer III
Respondent:
Warden of Columbia County Prison and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANDIS v. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LANDIS
Defendant:
ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STRESHENKOFF v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
ANDREW STRESHENKOFF
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
