Cases 51 - 60 of 3,989
JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01649
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
IN RE: ANTHONY YORGEY
as 5:2024cv01748
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY YORGEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLIER v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01614
Plaintiff:
MR. ANTHONY DENNIS COLLIER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
VENTO v. DOGAN et al
as 2:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VENTO
Defendant:
DEHA DOGAN, AVIS RENT A CAR and AVIS RENT A CAR doing business as PUI HOLDINGS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS, JERRY M. HOBECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WENDY ARIANA SPENCE v. YEADON BOROUGH et al
as 2:2024cv01530
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WENDY ARIANA SPENCE
Defendant:
YEADON BOROUGH, ROBERT WELLBROCK, DANIELLE PETTYJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAUCUM v. IANNAMORELLI et al
as 2:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BAUCUM
Defendant:
ANTHONY IANNAMORELLI, RAYMOND DUPILKA, MATTHEW SCHIMIZZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WELLPATH LLC
as 2:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
GARNET SMITH
Defendant:
WELLPATH, L.L.C., DR. SAEED BAZEL, DR. ANTHONY LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falsone v. USAA
as 2:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Anthony Falsone
Defendant:
USAA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ANTHONY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
SCOTT ANTHONY
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
