Cases 51 - 60 of 492
Ambercroft Trading Limited et al v. Chris Biddy et al
as 3:2019cv06810
Plaintiff:
Dmitri Kushaev and Ambercroft Trading Limited
Defendant:
Chris Biddy, Liudmila Kokorich, Mikhail Kokorich and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas Aquila, II v. LaShann Eppinger
as 19-3901
Respondent / Appellee:
LASHANN EPPINGER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS AQUILA, II
ABOOD et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03373
Plaintiff:
DAVID AKIN, JONATHAN L. ANDERSON, RONALD BAILEY and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abood et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02186
Plaintiff:
David Akin, Jonathan L. Anderson, Wesley Barnhouse and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Daniel II Joseph Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ecolono v. USA
as 1:2019cv00223
Petitioner:
Aquila Kaiulani Olanolan and Aquila Ecolono
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ecolono v. USA
as 1:2019cv00222
Petitioner:
Aquila Kaiulani Olanolan and Aquila Ecolono
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis v. EPA, et al
as 19-1130
Defendant / Appellee:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WISCONSIN
Intervenor / Appellee:
AQUILA RESOURCES, INC., a Canadian corporation
United States of America v. Toby J. Butterworth, et al
as 2:2018cv07479
Defendant:
Aquila Chrysaetos Outreach, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,, Rayetta Leigh Stanley and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America - Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Aquila Innovations, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
Aquila Innovations, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
