Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Wilson v. Cherry et al
as 1:2013cv00800
Petitioner:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Respondent:
Ralph Cherry, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Parole Commissioner and others
USA v. Stefan Wilson
as 13-10091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson, AKA Steven K. Wilson
Movant - Appellant:
RICHARD A. GRAY, Jr., GRAY INVESTMENT PARTNERS and CUMBERLAND HILL CAPITAL FUND, LP
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv00845
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilson v. Billingsley
as 13-279
Petitioner - Appellant:
Andre Wilson
Respondent - Appellee:
Billingsley, Warden
United States of America v. Barret (Gunter)
as 12-4663
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Barret, DBA Derrick Brown, AKA Sean Brown, AKA Mouthy, AKA The General, AKA Chris, AKA Solo, Kareem Forrest, AKA Dooley, AKA Kareem Forest, Ryan Anderson, AKA Dre and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kerry Gunter, AKA Guns
WILSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2012cv01700
Petitioner:
MARLON ANDRE WILSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Billingsley
as 1:2012cv07479
Petitioner:
Andre Wilson
Respondent:
Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILSON v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv03944
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WILSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. United States Parole Commisioner
as 1:2012cv00659
Petitioner:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commisioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
