Cases 51 - 60 of 916
Johnston v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Andrew James Johnston
Defendant:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young at Heart LLC v. Marshall
as 2:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Young at Heart LLC
Defendant:
Andrew Stanford Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitt v. Hayden et al
as 4:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Whitt
Defendant:
Unknown Hayden, Unknown Pointer, Unknown Alveres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wright v. Neves et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wright
Defendant:
Andrew Neves, Unknown Neves, Sabrina Liban and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Secura Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv08046
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Secura Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Whitt v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00096
Petitioner:
Steven Andrew Whitt
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vu v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Anh-Quan Andrew Vu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fantel v. Brutinel et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Fantel
Defendant:
Robert Brutinel, Pamela Sue Frasher Gates, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Babcock v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Andrew Francis Babcock
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
