Cases 51 - 60 of 105
United States of America v. Armando Rodriguez
as 2:2015cv07598
Defendant:
Armando Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Borkowski vs American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) et al
as 3:2015cv01162
Plaintiff:
Paul Borkowski , Nancy Escabi and Conjugal Society formed between Paul Borkowski and Nancy Escabi
Defendant:
American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO), Downey AYSO Region 24, Armando Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Wolfe v. Armando Rodriguez, et al
as 15-10046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. WOLFE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ and DEBORAH CORN
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv10219
Plaintiff:
Armando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Raul Rodriguez-Bonilla v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-73116
Petitioner:
RAUL ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ-BONILLA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rodriguez-Elvir v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00844
Plaintiff:
Oscar Armando Rodriguez-Elvir
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Oscar Rodriguez-Elvir
as 14-51035
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OSCAR ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ-ELVIR, also known as Oscar Rodriguez-Albir, also known as Oscar Rodriguez-Elvir, also known as Oscar Armando Elvir, also known as Oscar Elvir Rodriguez, also known as Oscar Armando Elvir-Rodriguez, also known as Oscar Armando Rodri
Armando Rodriguez v. J. D. Lozano
as 2:2014cv06733
Respondent:
J. D. Lozano
Petitioner:
Armando Rodriguez
Michael Wolfe v. Armando Rodriguez, et al
as 14-90016
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. WOLFE
Respondent:
ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ and DEBORAH CORN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16436
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
