Cases 51 - 60 of 225
O'Neil et al v. Hosemann et al
as 3:2018cv00815
Defendant:
Office of Election Commissioners of Hinds County, Jim Hood, Delbert Hosemann and others
Plaintiff:
Julianne Huber, Mississippi State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., Barbara O'Neil and others
Intervenor:
National Republican Senatorial Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Adams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Govenor Phil Bryant and State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Biancea Anderson v. South Sunflower County Hospital, et al
as 3:2018cv00692
Defendant:
South Sunflower County Hospital, Phil Bryant and James M. Hood
Plaintiff:
Biancea Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenard v. Bryant et al
as 4:2018cv00221
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Phil Bryant
Petitioner:
Fred Lenard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale v. Arnold et al
as 3:2018cv00754
Defendant:
MTC, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
John Hale
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. GILLIS et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Supt. Emmitt L. Sparkman, Roger Wruck and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMAN STEVE KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Blunt v. Weill, Sr. et al
as 3:2018cv00641
Defendant:
Barbara Dunn, Jim Hood, Brice R. White and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charlie Blunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas et al v. Bryant et al
as 3:2018cv00441
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Delbert Hosemann and Phil Bryant
Plaintiff:
Vernon Ayers, Joseph Thomas and Melvin Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Adams v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
David Adams
Respondent:
Phil Bryant and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
