Cases 51 - 60 of 508
Mcguinn v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2022cv03920
Plaintiff:
Leo Braden Mcguinn
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, Judith Burke, Deana Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tricoci v. Vidljinovic et al
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Vincenzo Tricoci
Defendant:
Steven Vidljinovic, Patrick Barker, Brendan McCrudden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jones v. Groth et al
as 1:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Jones
Defendant:
Kathaleen T. Groth, Stephen J. Connolly, Kathleen Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Dunn v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv50106
Plaintiff:
Nikolas S. Dunn
Defendant:
Terry Williams, Manzano, Blaze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DiMaio v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Tony F. DiMaio
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Patricia Burke, County of Kane and others
Petitioner:
Andrew Lee Flowers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ring v. Larkin, et al
as 1:2022cv00895
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Melanie Ring and Sheryl Ring
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Amy Bowne, John H. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Burke v. Burke et al
as 1:2021cv05971
Plaintiff:
Anna Renee Burke
Defendant:
Edward M. Burke, Donald Trump and Trump International Hotel-Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burke v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv05967
Plaintiff:
Anna Renee Burke
Defendant:
Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
