Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Herod v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00441
Plaintiff:
Brad Herod
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Platt et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2016cv08262
Plaintiff:
William Terence Platt and Maria B Platt
Defendant:
Jason Moore , Brad Carlyon , Navajo County Attorney's Office and others
Intervenor:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. Second Judicial Court et al
as 2:2016cv03772
Petitioner:
Dean Wilson
Respondent:
Second Judicial Court, Brad Newman, Walter Hennessy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OTO LLC et al v. Barnett et al
as 2:2016cv02633
Plaintiff:
OTO LLC and Brian McCafferty
Defendant:
Brad Barnett and Unknown Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
GEICO Indemnity Company v. Littles
as 2:2016cv01130
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Brad Littles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Pinal, County of et al
as 2:2015cv02539
Plaintiff:
Judith M Jones and Manuel Monarrez
Defendant:
Pinal, County of, Maricopa, City of, A Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEAResult Consulting Incorporated v. McNNNAC Energy Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv02313
Plaintiff:
CLEAResult Consulting Incorporated
Defendant:
McNNNAC Energy Services Incorporated, Alsus Innovation Group Limited, Brad Cumberland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eden #246262 v. Ducey et al
as 3:2015cv08237
Plaintiff:
Jace F Eden
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Mark Brnovich, Brad Carlyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
