Cases 51 - 60 of 145
Navient Solutions LLC v. Moore
as 2:2017cv02852
Plaintiff:
Navient Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Brad Moore
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Harris v. Unique Automotive, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01038
Plaintiff:
Viktor Harris
Defendant:
Unique Automotive, Inc., Brad Miser and Dustin Ellis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dunlap v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Brad H. Dunlap
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and U.S.Atty-Knoxville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Tucker et al v. Goodrich Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carl Tucker , Stephen Campbell , James Hensley and others
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation , United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union and United Steel, Paper And Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial And Service Workers International Union, Local 6817
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bolton v. USA
as 3:2016cv00229
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brad Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beard v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
James H. Beard, Jr.
Defendant:
LoAmma Smith, Helen Johnson, Ozata Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01071
Movant:
Brad Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maston et al v. Eagle Property Management, Inc. et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00484
Plaintiff:
Russell Maston and Susan Maston
Defendant:
Eagle Property Management, Inc. and Brad Ivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
