Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,004
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00794
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: SEAN CARTER
as 2:2023cv00643
Plaintiff: SEAN CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER et al v. CHILD & YOUTH SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00798
Plaintiff: NIGEL DEDIEECE CARTER, LYKEL KING CARTER and LACIEYA ROSALEE STEVENS
Defendant: CHILD & YOUTH SERVICES and DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. LINCOLN SQUARE 1766 ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00733
Plaintiff: COURTNEY CARTER
Defendant: LINCOLN SQUARE 1766 ASSOCIATES, LLC, PETSMART, INC. and PETSMART LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
COTTLE v. LT. RANDLE et al
as 2:2023cv00743
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER COTTLE
Defendant: LIEUTENANT RANDALL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff: Michael Carter
Defendant: Megan Hayes and Adams County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY v. CARTER
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff: ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant: VIRGIL CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
CARTER
as 2:2023mc00048
CARTER v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Petitioner: RALPH JUSTIN CARTER, JR.
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT ESTOCK and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen et al v. Salem Township
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff: Scott Allen, Troy Campbell, Rose Campbell and others
Defendant: Salem Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?