Cases 51 - 60 of 69
White House/Black Market, Inc. et al v. Cache, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05266
Plaintiff:
White House/Black Market, Inc. and Chico's FAS, Inc.
Defendant:
Cache, Inc. and Christine Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUSSO v. CHICO'S FAS, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv01624
Plaintiff:
LORI RUSSO
Defendant:
CHICO'S FAS, INC. and ELIZABETH MEDEIROS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McLaren v. Chico's FAS, Inc.
as 1:2010cv02481
Plaintiff:
Chesley McLaren
Defendant:
Chico's FAS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
McLaren v. Chico's FAS, Inc.
as 7:2010cv02481
Plaintiff:
Chesley McLaren
Defendant:
Chico's FAS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Type:
Civil Rights
Fabrique Innovations Corp. v. Chico's FAS, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04204
Plaintiff:
Fabrique Innovations Corp.
Defendant:
Chico's FAS, Inc., Shennel Trading Group, ABC Supplier Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Landmark Technology LLC v. Aropostale et al
as 6:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology LLC
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Autozone, Inc.,, Chico's FAS, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
