Cases 51 - 60 of 139
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CTY. et al
as 2:2014cv06162
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Defendant:
CCP OF PHILA. CTY., U.S.A. CORPORATION, CITY OF PHILA., MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv04414
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA., THE PHILA TRAFFIC COURT and THE PHILA PARKING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv03764
Plaintiff:
DARNELL BOYD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, PPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. STATE OF PA et al
as 2:2014cv03818
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent:
STATE OF PA, EMR, CITY OF PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GADDY v. CITY OF PHILA. POLICE DEP'T et al
as 2:2014cv03435
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GADDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. POLICE DEP'T , MATTHEW WINSCOM and MICHAEL CHICHEARO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUNSIL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv02383
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant:
FARRELL, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES/CORIZON, NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILA HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
LIONEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORPE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv07231
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELLIOTT THORPE
Defendant:
MIKE NUTTER, THE CITY OF PHILA, CFCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv06447
Plaintiff:
EUGENE W. SHY
Defendant:
MIKE NUTTER, THE CITY OF PHILA, CFCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON et al v. CROSS et al
as 2:2013cv05955
Plaintiff:
JERRY K. LAWSON, HIANIF A. LAWSON, CRYSTAL K. LAWSON and others
Defendant:
SHANDA CROSS, THOMAS MARTINKA, THOMAS DONNYELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
