Cases 51 - 60 of 165
Michael Brent Pectol v. Brent Ernest Pectol et al
as 2:2018cv05870
Defendant:
Employees Shasta County District Attorneys Office, Douglas McMullin, Verlin Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Brent Pectol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Municipality City of Redding
as 1:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Moses
Defendant:
Municipality City of Redding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moses v. Municipality City of Redding
as 2:2018cv00434
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Moses
Defendant:
Municipality City of Redding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heard v. City of Red Wing et al
as 0:2017cv02940
Plaintiff:
Shequita A Heard
Defendant:
City of Red Wing, Justin Hesse, Nick Sather and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Redding v. General Reinsurance Corporation
as 2:2017cv01152
Defendant:
General Reinsurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
City of Redding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharma v. City of Redding
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Narendra Sharma
Defendant:
City of Redding
Receiver:
Richardson Griswold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeler v. City of Redding et al.
as 2:2016cv02805
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jean Keeler
Defendant:
City of Redding, Eric Forsberg and Robert F. Paoletti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dwight Ratcliff v. City of Red Lodge, Department, et al
as 16-35941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT RATCLIFF
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RED LODGE, DEPARTMENT OF POLICE, a Political Subdivision of the State of Montana and AL STUBER, a Red Lodge Police Officer
Juan Bautista Berenguer v. Anoka County, et al
as 16-4123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan Bautista Berenguer
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, City of Bloomington, City of Brooklyn Park and others
Jones v. City of Red Oak Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv01442
Plaintiff:
Deion Jones
Defendant:
City of Red Oak Police Department , Unknown Officers and Unknown Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
