Cases 51 - 60 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Double Blue Jay Corporation v. Hansen Beverage Company et al
as 8:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
Double Blue Jay Corporation
Defendant:
Hansen Beverage Company and Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PEMBERTON v. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES INC.
as 4:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
KEITH PEMBERTON
Defendant:
COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patton v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
Jim Patton
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prothro v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
as 4:2009mc00542
Plaintiff:
Lonnie S C Prothro, IV
Defendant:
Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
Marquez et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv06570
Plaintiff:
George Marquez, Javier Rodriguez and Widalys Gonzalez
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. and Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
