Cases 51 - 60 of 108,115
Velasquez v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Yvonne Velasquez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Murdoch v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Mark H Murdoch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Riffett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Janice M Riffett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Irwin v. O'Malley
as 24-3204
Plaintiff:
CARMEL C. IRWIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Zack v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02355
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Zack
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dana K. Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Majtyka v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Majtyka
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Corbett v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Leslie Corbett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Teresa Contreras v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Teresa Contreras
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
