Cases 51 - 60 of 225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Greenville, County of et al
as 2:2021cv00659
Defendant:
Claude Todd, Greer, City of, Greenville, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Epstin et al
as 2:2021cv00457
Defendant:
James Palmer, Tao Epstin, Eric Pendelton and others
Plaintiff:
George Irving Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00399
Defendant:
Penni Padgett, Justin Solberg and J Adam Shepherd
Plaintiff:
George Irving Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lauck v. Campbell, County of et al
as 3:2021cv08036
Plaintiff:
David M Lauck
Defendant:
Black Diamond Investigation and Security Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Campbell, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Getzen v. Mascher et al
as 3:2021cv08014
Defendant:
Edward Young, Joshua Sprieter, Tommy Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
David Getzen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Louie Tartaglia, Mark J Dannels and others
Plaintiff:
Fleming & Curti PLC, Alec Campbell and Mahliya Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv02048
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stanberry-Sproles v. Wade et al
as 2:2020cv02027
Defendant:
Adina Wade, Sherri Krismann and Sean Campbell
Plaintiff:
Aneta Stanberry-Sproles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality et al
as 2:2020cv01721
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Dominic W Lanza, Mark Brnovich and others
Plaintiff:
Brittian Willie Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
