Cases 51 - 60 of 2,330
Cardenas et al v. New Generations Concrete, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Fredy Cardenas and Isai Rodriguez
Defendant:
New Generations Concrete, LLC and Francisco De Matto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cardenas v. Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gabina Villa Cardenas
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cardenas v. Capital Infusion LLC
as 1:2024cv20647
Plaintiff:
Erica Cardenas
Defendant:
Capital Infusion LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hoover v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
James Hoover
Defendant:
Lieutenant Miller and Captain Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardinas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Norma Linda Cardinas and Norma Linda Cardenas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RP/Essex Skyline Holdings, LLC v. Ronald Cardenas et al
as 8:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
RP/Essex Skyline Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Ronald Cardenas and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CARDENAS v. BUSINESS DEBT ADJUSTERS LLC
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
ERICA CARDENAS
Defendant:
BUSINESS DEBT ADJUSTERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
