Cases 51 - 60 of 914
Ross et al v. NextGen Healthcare Inc.
as 1:2023cv02296
Plaintiff:
Christah Ross and Carter Bundy
Defendant:
NextGen Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Carter v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02292
Plaintiff:
Tawana L. Carter
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CARTER v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY F. CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Defendant:
Deputy Owens, Deputy Carter, Deputy Buton and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Tyquon Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Walker
as 1:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Matt Walker, IV
Defendant:
Rorieta Joy Walker and Judge Geronda V. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONALDSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
MISTEA DONALDSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Jessica Howard, DASIA MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. University Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
University Health Services, Inc. and Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Hamilton v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Roland Boehrer, Terrance Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Lee Hines
Defendant:
Ms. Carter and DeShawn Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Barrs
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Brian Barrs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
