Cases 51 - 60 of 147
Lee v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05942
Plaintiff:
Casey Lee
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith et al v. New Casey's LLC dba T K Auto
as 2:2017cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith and Lucia Shumaker
Defendant:
New Casey's LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Cline v. Safeway Inc, et al
as 3:2017cv05828
Plaintiff:
Casey K Cline
Defendant:
Safeway Inc , Karen Doe and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrison v. Price et al
as 2:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Garrison
Defendant:
Michael P Price, Annette S Plese, Larry Haskill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Department of Corrections State of Washington et al
as 4:2017cv05087
Plaintiff:
Aaron Joseph Cunningham
Defendant:
Department of Corrections State of Washington, Casey Potts, G Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bistryski v. DOC Health Services of Stafford Creek Corrections Center et al
as 3:2017cv05369
Plaintiff:
Christopher Andrew Bistryski
Defendant:
DOC Health Services of Stafford Creek Corrections Center, DoC Health Services of Monroe Corrections Center Special Offender Center, S Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv03084
Plaintiff:
Casey Briggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Arias v. Gillette et al
as 1:2016cv03213
Plaintiff:
Lorena Arias
Defendant:
Casey Gillette , Dominic Rizzi , City of Yakima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckard v. Pease et al
as 4:2016cv05114
Plaintiff:
Gabriel A Eckard
Defendant:
Charles Pease, Donald Holbrook and Casey Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahl v Mason County et al
as 3:2016cv05719
Plaintiff:
Keith Dahl
Defendant:
Mason County , Tom Haugen , Behavioral Health Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
