Cases 51 - 60 of 418
Harris v. Grima et al
as 2:2022cv11422
Plaintiff:
Martaneze Harris
Defendant:
Timothy M Grima, Joseph D Walker and City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Watley et al v. Kenny et al
as 2:2022cv11392
Plaintiff:
William Rayeh Watley, William-ray Watley, William Daniel Watley and others
Defendant:
Timothy M. Kenny, Jacquelyn A. Mcclinton, Justin L. Smith and others
Briggs v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11300
Plaintiff:
John Briggs
Defendant:
City of Detroit and Officer Stanley Kropik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tanaka v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11219
Plaintiff:
Peter Tanaka
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Timothy Barr and John Doe Officers 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goldenberg v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11217
Plaintiff:
Oren Goldenberg
Defendant:
City of Detroit, John Doe Officers 1-5 and Stacie A. Cybulski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Abney v. City of Detroit Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv11176
Plaintiff:
Devon Terrell Abney
Defendant:
City of Detroit Police Department, Alaa Ali and John Doe
Langford v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv10939
Plaintiff:
Kristiel Langford
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, City of Detroit, Michigan, State of Michigan and others
City of Detroit v. Brunswick Commercial & Government Products et al
as 2:2022cv10938
Plaintiff:
City of Detroit
Defendant:
Brunswick Commercial & Government Products, Konrad Marine, Inc. and MetalCraft Marine Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Hison V. Lloyd et al
as 2:2022cv10943
Defendant:
Errol Hison, Officer Tad Lloyd, Kairy Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warwick v. Bryant et al
as 2:2022cv10896
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Antoine Bryant, Mike Duggan, Aaron Goodman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
