Cases 51 - 60 of 237
McArthur v. Protective Services
as 3:2020cv01025
Defendant:
Protective Services and City of New Haven
Plaintiff:
Alexander McArthur
McArthur v. Summit Security et al
as 3:2020cv01002
Defendant:
Department of Social Services, Summit Security and City of New Haven
Plaintiff:
Alexander McArthur
McArthur v. Yale New Haven Hospital et al
as 3:2020cv00998
Defendant:
Protective Services, Yale New Haven Hospital and City of New Haven
Plaintiff:
Alexander McArthur
McArthur v. Cargil et al
as 3:2020cv00967
Defendant:
New Haven Police Department, Daryl Cargil and City of New Haven
Plaintiff:
Alexander McArthur
Johnson v. New Haven
as 20-1431
Defendant / Appellant:
Herman Badger, Officers, in their individual capacities, Francisco Ortiz, Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacity and Patrick Redding, Officers, in their individual capacities
Defendant:
Clarence Willoughby, Officers, in their individual capacities, City of New Haven, Michael Quinn, Officers, in their individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bobby Johnson
Brantley v. New Haven et al
as 3:2019cv01894
Defendant:
Michael Dennison, Patrick J. Griffin and City of New Haven
Plaintiff:
Darryl Brantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabasquini v. New Haven Police Department
as 3:2019cv01873
Defendant:
City of New Haven Police Department
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Cabasquini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petaway v. New Haven et al
as 3:2019cv01717
Defendant:
Reyes, John Doe, Harpe and others
Plaintiff:
William Petaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paca v. New Haven
as 19-3146
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New Haven
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Paca
Defendant:
Toni N. Harp, Mayor, Individually
King v. Nesto et al
as 3:2019cv01466
Defendant:
Eric Eisenhard, Kyle Listro, City of New Haven and others
Plaintiff:
Rashea King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
