Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Raeburn Grasty v. Isaac Anderson
as 10-1964
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAEBURN S. GRASTY
Defendant - Appellant:
ISAAC T. ANDERSON, Officer and CHRISTOPHER M. HAMILTON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ROANOKE, A.L. JOE GASKINS, Chief of Police and BARBARA P. CARTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00260
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Reynolds v. City of Roanoke
as 7:2010mc00034
Trustee:
Charles R. Allen, Jr.
Interested Party:
Bankruptcy-Roanoke
Defendant:
City of Roanoke
Debtor:
Ern Reynolds
Plaintiff:
Ern Reynolds
Hudson v. Phyllis Lee, et al.
as 4:2010cv00002
Defendant:
Phyllis P Lee, Phyllis P Lee, Gary Corbet and others
Plaintiff:
Danny W.L. Hudson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bell v. City of Roanoke Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
DaVon Bell
Defendant:
City of Roanoke Sheriff's Office, Octavia L. Johnson, Brandon Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemonts v. Teal et al
as 4:2009cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jerry C. Clemonts
Defendant:
G. H. Teal and City of Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1974
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fru-Con Construction Corporation v. City of Roanoke, Virginia et al
as 7:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
Fru-Con Construction Corporation
Defendant:
City of Roanoke, Virginia and Western Virginia Water Authority
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
