Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Rauch v. Denney et al
as 5:2017cv06053
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Rauch
Defendant:
Larry Denney, Dorsch, Corizon Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Kuttenkuler et al
as 2:2017cv04063
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Christina Kuttenkuler , Cyndi Prudden , Allen Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv04059
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Ross
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Corizon Medical Services, Andrea Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray King
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, Dewayne Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Cofield et al
as 6:2017cv03030
Plaintiff:
Darryl Cornell Merritt
Defendant:
Jason Cofield, Renee Todaro, Kathy Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberton v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2016cv06178
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Roberton
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and J. Cofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schnelle v. Corizon Medical Services LLC et al
as 5:2016cv06171
Plaintiff:
James Randall Schnelle
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services LLC, Hollie Hild and MO DOC Ad-Seg Committee Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2016cv04323
Plaintiff:
Michael Andre Mahone
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Corrections, Chad Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2016cv04314
Plaintiff:
Universal-Unison A Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Krystal Houston, Pamala Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gassel v. Jones, MD et al
as 4:2016cv01663
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gassel
Defendant:
Paul Jones, MD and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
