Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Kessler, III v. Rodriquez et al
as 1:2017cv00741
Plaintiff:
Windsor W. Kessler, III
Defendant:
Lt. Rodriquez, Counselor J. Demming, Case Manager A. Fabian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2016cv00706
Petitioner:
Brent Scott Bailey
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOP Director Samuels, DSCC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Madden v. Franzen et al
as 2:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Franzen, Knewgen, Barbara Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Wilson et al
as 1:2015cv01542
Plaintiff:
Marzell Underwood
Defendant:
Eric D. Wilson, Bruce Norman, LT. Vaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ganzie v. Ponton et al
as 2:2014cv00350
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ganzie
Defendant:
Warden Ponton, Investigator Moicjek, Counselor Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kessley v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Windsor Kessley
Defendant:
John Doe, P. A. Katta, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dougherty v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2012cv00549
Defendant:
Sheriff Stan Barry, Lieutenant Michael Chapman, Lieutenant Patty Chartak and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarpley v. BeddowMarley, Attorneys & Counselors at Law
as 3:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Skyler L. Tarpley
Defendant:
BeddowMarley, Attorneys & Counselors at Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hicks v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00069
Respondent:
Harold Clark, John S. Garman, R. C. Mathena and others
Petitioner:
Deonta Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spears v. Caltion et al
as 7:2011cv00577
Defendant:
Officer Caltion, Officer Hagy and Counselor Poston
Plaintiff:
Mark Allyn Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
