Cases 51 - 60 of 154
THOMPSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv03550
Plaintiff:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Defendant:
KENNETH GOODMAN, TAMMY FERGUSON, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NADAB v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv03537
Plaintiff:
ERNEST NADAB
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, KENNETH GOODMAN, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARNS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv03534
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, KENNETH GOODMAN, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE L. HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHIE, et al. v. BLACK AND GERNGROSS, P.C., et al.
as 2:2020cv02773
Plaintiff:
MEGAN M. YOUNG and Alfred Jordan Rushie
Defendant:
JENNA ELISE RUSHIE, BLACK AND GERNGROSS, P.C., Elizabeth Santry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALSH v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
KEVIN COWAN, JOHN DOES #1-20, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB DANIEL WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BISSEY et al v. SKYJACK, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv06206
Defendant:
SKYJACK, INC., LINAMAR CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
PEGGY BISSEY and DANIEL BISSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dziedzic et al v. United Rentals, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02030
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, CNH Industrial America, LLC and United Rentals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dziedzic and James Dziedzic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCAVO v. LIFELABS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03987
Defendant:
DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE, ZR MEDIA, LLC, GADGETPUSH and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL SCAVO
WOLFGRAMM v. COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 13301 et al
as 2:2019cv03701
Plaintiff:
ROSAMUND A. WOLFGRAMM
Defendant:
BETH NORTON, COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 2-13, DENNIS EICHFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DIAZ v. BTG INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01664
Defendant:
JENNIFER KEASHON, JOHN DOES X-XX, GUENTER JANHOFER and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON DIAZ and CANDACE AGATE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
