Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Med-Trans Corporation v. Dempsey Benton
as 08-1952
Appellant: THE CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas Medical Center, MISSION HOSPITALS, INCORPORATED, NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: MED-TRANS CORPORATION
Defendant - None: DEMPSEY BENTON, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, ROBERT J. FITZGERALD, Director, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, LEE B. HOFFMAN, Chief, Certificate of Need Section, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity and others
DUKE UNIVERSITY et al v. MASSEY ENERGY CO. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00591
Plaintiff: DUKE UNIVERSITY and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Defendant: MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY and MASSEY COAL SALES CO., INC. D/B/A MASSEY INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Godwin v. HMSHost Corporation Medical Plan et al
as 5:2008cv00383
Plaintiff: Joyce Godwin
Defendant: HMSHost Corporation Medical Plan, Duke University Health System, Inc., WAKE ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. LEAVITT
as 1:2008cv01336
Plaintiff: ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL, ALBEMARLE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Type: Contract None
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2008cv00392
Petitioner: DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Respondent: ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
FULLER v. PRADHAN, M.D. et al
as 1:2008cv00369
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF LEVI FULLER
Defendant: ASHUTOSH A. PRADHAN, M.D., ASHUTOSH A. PRADHAN, M.D., DUKE UNIVERSITY d/b/a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Med-Trans Corporation v. Robert Fitzgerald
as 08-1438
Appellant: NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff - Appellee: MED-TRANS CORPORATION
Defendant - None: ROBERT J. FITZGERALD, Director, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, LEE B. HOFFMAN, Chief, Certificate of Need Section, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity, DREXDAL R. PRATT, Chief, Office of Emergency Medical Services, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and others
Kwabena Mawulawde v. Board of Regents of the Univer
as 08-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant: KWABENA MAWULAWDE, MD
Defendant - None: BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, DANIEL W. RAHN, MD, Indiv. and in his Official Capacity as President, Medical School of Georgia, DAVID STERN, MD, Indiv. and his Official Capacity as Dean, School of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia and others
Movant - Appellee: DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED and DUKE UNIVERSITY
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff: EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARRELL v. DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC.
as 1:2008cv00018
Plaintiff: GENE EDWARD HARRELL, JR.
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?